Friday, January 20, 2006

Legal Rationale by Justice Dept. on Spying Effort - New York Times

Legal Rationale by Justice Dept. on Spying Effort - New York Times

This proves it then, that we have an unconstitutional presidency that will operate outside the law. Any person who says that a wiretap in the United States without a warrant is justified can't be right. National security requires some secrecy, but a warrantless wiretap can't be justified under any legal doctrine. To make such a wiretap permissible, we would have to change the law. The president's defense of his actions shows that if the law conflicts with his beliefs about what national security requires, he'll go with his beliefs.

No comments:

Post a Comment